My mother always hems and haws about modernized operas. They bother me sometimes, but that's another story.
My point is, I always thought we only started modernizing operas recently. As it turns out, this is not true.
I've been reading Angus Heriot's
The Castrati in Opera (extremely informational and just as entertaining) and I learned that they "modernized" operas back in the 18th century just like they do today. Dido was careful to pick up her hoop-dress when she dove into her funeral pyre and Julius Caesar wore the most exquisite embroidered stockings. And we can't forget about the ghosts of Shakespeare's stories donning powdered wigs! So this is not such a new idea after all.
I suppose the fact that we're so accustomed to movies affects our view of opera. Films are, on the whole, meticulous about accurately recreating the time period in which they are set. Taking things out of their time-period is a "new" idea to us 21th century people. This is why Titus of Rome in an Italian suit is a strange sight.
I believe there is a conception that taking operas out of their appropriate time-period makes a production "creative" or "new" or "inventive." Quite the contrary. Done correctly, a modernization doesn't add much to an opera. Done incorrectly, a modernization destroys an opera. Overall, I don't see the inherent good of this practice. It is possible to do something "new" and "creative" without taking the work out of its setting.
Perfect example: Anthony Minghella’s
Madama Butterfly (Metropolitan Opera, Patricia Racette). No one can say that it wasn't creative and inventive and new. It kept to the time period and yet was something completely different from previous productions. The production was effective and absolutely
gorgeous. And it still harkened to modern-style opera with its stark set (as opposed to the lavish sets of the past few decades). My point: you don't have to change the time period in order to create something new!
There are some operas which
cannot be removed from their natural setting. Perfect example:
Der Rosenkavalier. How can you set that opera anywhere but 18th century Vienna? I cannot begin to explain the consequences of such an action. To make a long argument short: changing the setting would undermine the objective of the plot. It would cease to be
Der Rosenkavalier. It would be something new and horrifically inferior to its predecessor.
Ok, so my little rant is over. I'm sorry if anyone's upset.